To start off, I would like to announce that this is not my idea. I believe that this concept was discovered by my esteemed colleagues Matthew S. and Jenny F. I do not claim to understand the concept fully. I plan to explore it here.
The Female Happiness Quotient (FHQ)
The basic idea is this:
A female human becomes increasingly happier the more that she rotates about a fixed axis ("spins") up to the point of dizziness, sickness, or exhaustion, at which the happiness level declines. The caveat is sometimes excluded.
We adopt a general formula to demonstrate the mathematics behind this concept.
Where y is the happiness of the female, x is the duration of spinning (adjusted for speed and axis of rotation), and q is the coefficient of happiness (derived in part from the ratio of spinning to happiness, hence the word "quotient" in the title of the concept). The coefficient of happiness is always greater than 0.
A graph may help.
This shows a simple FHQ graph with q = 3. We disregard any values of y < 0 (happiness may seem to be negative, but that is deceptive as the sadness factor is the cause for such a feeling). As we can see, the happiness level rises to a certain point, then begins to fall as the spinning continues. Some FHQs are more difficult to calculate depending on the female in question, but the principle remains roughly the same.
It has been debated that there is no point at which a female begins to lose happiness, and so the graph would be linear or logarithmic in its increase. This may be the case for certain females, but most follow the general formula given, at least loosely.
This idea is still a theory as of yet, but it has proven to be the general case for several known females, and has yet to be disproved.
The study of the Female Happiness Quotient began during a social rhythmic movement gathering at which females were noted to smile and continue to smile while spinning. Their expressions were happier than normal after the spinning stopped, although without much spinning afterward, they continued to decline to normal.
*Correction* I have been informed by my colleagues that the credit for the original discovery of this concept should be attributed to Nathaniel W. and his brother. My apologies.
Chatboard (0)